Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Druett v Department of Families, Community Services & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2009] FCA 898
GARRY KEITH DRUETT v DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NSD 751 of 2007
BENNETT J
11 AUGUST 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 751 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: GARRY KEITH DRUETT
Appellant
AND: DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BENNETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 AUGUST 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be no order as to costs in matter number NSD 751 of 2007. 2. The notice of motion filed on 5 August 2009 be dismissed. 3. There be no order as to costs in relation to the notice of motion filed on 5 August 2009. 4. The Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs be removed as a party to the proceedings. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 751 of 2007
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: GARRY KEITH DRUETT
Appellant
AND: DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BENNETT J
DATE: 11 AUGUST 2009
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND 1 In 2007, the appellant, Mr Druett, filed an application for leave to appeal from a decision of a judge of this Court. That decision involved an appeal from a decision of the second respondent, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ('the Tribunal'). 2 The hearing of Mr Druett's application took place on 21 May 2007. At the hearing, counsel for the first respondent, the Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs ('the Department'), accepted that leave to appeal was not required. Counsel for the Department also foreshadowed that it would be filing a notice of motion seeking summary judgment pursuant to s 25(2B)(aa) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ('the Federal Court Act') and, in the alternative, an order that the Department be removed as a party to the proceedings pursuant to s 25(2B)(a) of the Federal Court Act. The notice of motion was filed on 24 May 2007. 3 The parties made oral submissions regarding the Department's notice of motion. I also gave Mr Druett the opportunity to provide further written submissions in relation to the motion. 4 I handed down my decision regarding the Department's notice of motion on 3 July 2007: Druett v Department of Families, Community Services & Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 995. After considering Mr Druett's notice of appeal, the parties' submissions and the decisions of the Tribunal and the primary judge, I could see no error of law on the part of the Tribunal or on the part of the primary judge. I concluded that there was no ground of appeal which might be arguable and that the appeal should be summarily dismissed. I also concluded that there was no basis upon which the Department was properly a party to the proceedings and that the Department was entitled to be removed as a party. 5 Accordingly, I ordered that the proceedings be summarily dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(aa) of the Federal Court Act. I did not make an order that the Department be removed as a party to the proceedings, as that order was only sought in the alternative to the application for summary dismissal. 6 At the handing down of my decision on 3 July 2007, I indicated that I would hear from the parties as to costs. The Department indicated that it did not seek costs. I made a notation to this effect but did not make any formal order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate