Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZNCT v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 907
MIGRATION —impermissible challenge to facts as found by Tribunal — no requirement to make further inquiries — no requirement on part of Tribunal to supplement facts relied upon PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE —appointment of parent as tutor — award of costs against tutor
Held: Appeal dismissed
Immigration (Guardianship of Children) Act 1946 (Cth) ss 5, 6 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 427(1)(d) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules O 43 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Opened for signature 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 150 (entered into force 22 April 1954) Art 1A(2)
Applicant S214 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2006] FCA 375, 90 ALD 632, cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, applied Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 10) [2009] FCA 498, cited Ex parte Davis (1901) 1 SR (NSW) 187, cited Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2000] FCA 589, 173 ALR 362, cited Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 480, 190 ALR 543, applied F Hoffman-La Roche and Co v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [1975] AC 295, cited Knight v FP Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178, applied Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39, cited Manton International Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCAFC 76, applied Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le [2007] FCA 1318, 161 FCR 151, cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274, 106 FCR 426, applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka [1999] FCA 1, 84 FCR 411, cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cassim [2000] HCA 50, 175 ALR 209, applied Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Eshetu[1999] HCA 21, 197 CLR 611, applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v NBDS [2006] FCA 265, 90 ALD 614, applied Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 47, applied NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCAFC 263, 144 FCR 1, applied Odhiambo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 194, 122 FCR 29, cited Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, applied S1925 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 246, applied SBAH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 426, 126 FCR 552, applied SCAW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 810, applied SFGB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 231, 77 ALD 402, cited SZIAI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1372, 104 ALD 22, cited SZJXW v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 143, cited SZNCT & SZNCU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FMCA 233, affirmed X v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 995, 92 FCR 524, cited SZNCT AND ANOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate