Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Uniline Australia Ltd ACN 010 752 057 v SBriggs Pty Ltd ACN 007 415 518 (No. 2) [2009] FCA 920
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – consideration of the disposition of costs in a proceeding which involved success by the applicant in a claim to relief based upon unjustified threats of patent infringement and infringement of a registered design, a cross‑claim by the intellectual property owner for relief based upon infringement and a further cross‑claim by the applicant asserting invalidity of the patent on a number of grounds – consideration of an offer to compromise – consideration of Order 23, rule 11 of the Federal Court Rules and the principles guiding the exercise of discretion in the disposition of costs as to either the claims or issues within the claims PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - consideration of an offer to compromise – consideration of Order 23, rule 11 of the Federal Court Rules and the principles guiding the exercise of discretion in the disposition of costs as to either the claims or issues within the claims – consideration of whether an offer to compromise which foregoes a claim to a recovery of costs incurred to the date of the offer is a genuine offer of compromise
Federal Court Rules, Order 23, rule 11 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43 and 59
Uniline Australia Ltd v SBriggs Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 222; (2009) 81 IRP 42 PAC Mining Pty Ltd v Esco Corporation (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 52 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (1979) 28 ALR 201 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No. 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 at 234 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 601 Stena Rederi Aktiebolag v Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1141 Windsurfing International Inc. v Petit (1987) AIPC 90‑441 Doric Products Pty Ltd v Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 282 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2007] FCAFC 172 JVMB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 6 Sydney Markets Limited v Sydney Flower Market Pty Limited [2002] FCA 283 Wills & Anor v Bigmac Pty Ltd,Federal Court of Australia, BC9400210 Smith v 600 Machinery Australia Pty Ltd, Federal Court of Australia, BC9605672 Hillier v Sheather (1995) 36 NSWLR 414 Houatchanthara v Bednarczyk, (New South Wales Court of Appeal, BC9604998 New South Wales Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Reeve (1993) 42 NSWLR 100 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Braverus Maritime Inc (No 2) (2005) 212 ALR 281 CGU Insurance Limited v Corrections Corporation of Australia Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 173 Review 2 Pty Ltd v Redberry Enterprise Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1805
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate