Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parker v Antoine [2009] FCA 929
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – application brought pursuant to Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) to review conduct of respondent – objection to competency of application – whether conduct for the purpose of making a decision to which the ADJR Act applies – meaning of 'decision' under ADJR Act – whether substantive determination – whether applicant has standing to bring application Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3, 3(d), 5, 6, 8 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 353-10 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 317 Electricity Supply Assn of Australia Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (2001) 113 FCR 230 Evans v Friemann (1981) 35 ALR 428 Griffith University v Tang (2005) 221 CLR 99 Guss v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 152 FCR 88 Hutchins v Commissioner of Taxationn (1996) 65 FCR 269 Khatri v Price (1999) 95 FCR 287 Mirvac Homes (NSW) Pty Limited v Airservices Australia (No 1) [2004] FCA 109 R v Federal Court of Australia; Ex parte WA National Football League (1979) 143 CLR 190 Residual Assco Group Ltd v Spalvins (2000) 202 CLR 629 Salerno v National Crime Authority (1997) 75 FCR 133 Social Services, Director-General of v Chaney (1980) 31 ALR 571 ANDREW STEPHEN PARKER v GEORGE ANTOINE
WAD 78 of 2008
MCKERRACHER J
25 August 2009
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 78 of 2008
BETWEEN: ANDREW STEPHEN PARKER
Applicant
AND: GEORGE ANTOINE
Respondent
JUDGE: MCKERRACHER J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 August 2009
WHERE MADE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate