Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Allphones Retail Pty Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2009] FCA 980
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – preliminary discovery – identity discovery – applicant required to produce documents to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission by a notice under s 155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – Commission official disclosed some information obtained from those documents to third persons – whether that disclosure was a breach of s 155AAA(1) of the Trade Practices Act – whether any equitable duty of confidence owed by the Commission and its staff to a person who produces documents to it under compulsion in response to a s 155 notice – whether foreshadowed causes of action and claims for relief have sufficient prospects of success to justify the making of a preliminary discovery order – whether the interests of justice would be served by the making of such an order – application for preliminary discovery order refused Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 51AC, 51AD, 52, 59, 155, 155AAA Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A Federal Court Rules, O 15 r 3, O 15A r 6, O 46 r 6
Allphones Retail Pty Ltd v Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 85 related Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 253 ALR 324 related Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Amcor Limited (2008) 246 ALR 137, [2008] ATPR 42-218 cited Commonwealth v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1980) 147 CLR 39 cited Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Co Ltd v Long (1957) 97 CLR 36 cited Glencore International AG v Selwyn Mines Ltd (2005) 223 ALR 238 cited Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 1 applied Hoy Mobile Pty Limited v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) (2008) ATPR 42-240 cited John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Cojuangco (1988) 165 CLR 346 followed Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469 cited Monsanto Company v Syngenta Seeds Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 228 referred to Rush v Commissioner of Police (2006) 150 FCR 165 cited Wyeth v Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing (2009) 255 ALR 352 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate