Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v TAFE Commission [2009] FCA 1024
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - application for an extension of time pursuant to s 46PO(2) of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – whether there is any explanation for delay – whether there is any prejudice to the respondent if extension is granted – whether the applicant has an arguable case – the applicant did not provide an adequate explanation for the entire period of delay nor does the applicant have an arguable case – application for extension of time refused. Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth)ss 46PH(1)(c), 46PH(2), 46PO(1) and 46PO(2) Federal Court Rules O 11 r 16, O 26 r 5(1), O 46 r 7A and O 81 r 5 Bahonko v Nurses Board of Victoria (No 4) (2007) 97 ALD 721 applied
CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER v TAFE COMMISSION
NSD 495 of 2009
EDMONDS J
14 SEPTEMBER 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 495 of 2009
BETWEEN: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER
Applicant
AND: TAFE COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 SEPTEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for an extension of time in which to file his originating application be refused. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs including those of opposing the applicant's application for an extension of time.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 495 of 2009
BETWEEN: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate