Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cahill v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 4) [2009] FCA 1040
INDUSTRIAL LAW – contraventions of s 43 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) – amount of penalties to be imposed – relevant considerations – nature and extent of unlawful conduct – consequences of contravening conduct – previous similar unlawful conduct, including prior contraventions – relevance of previous contravention by another autonomous division of the Union – contraventions had common purpose but distinct in time, place and coercion exerted – relevance of, and weight to be given to, size and financial position and non-profit-making objective of Union – general and specific deterrence – totality principle COSTS – applicant partially successful in his pleaded case – respondents filed further amended defence on first day of trial – appropriate costs order – applicant entitled to part of his costs to reflect measure of success – respondents to pay applicant's costs thrown away by reason of amendment on party-party basis Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) ss 3, 38, 43, 49 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA Stuart-Mahoney v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2008) 177 IR 61 referred to Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) (1999) 94 IR 231 referred to Williams v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2009] FCA 548 cited Temple v Powell (2008) 173 IR 189 discussed Alfred v Walter Construction Group Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 497 referred to R v McInerney (1986) 42 SASR 111 referred to Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2006) 164 IR 375 discussed A & L Silvestri v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2008] FCA 466 cited Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan (2008) 168 FCR 383 cited Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2004] FCA 517 cited Draffin v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2009] FCA 243 cited Duffy v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union (No 2) [2009] FCA 299 cited BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2001] FCA 336 cited Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 118 FCR 236 referred to Lisette Pine v Expoconti Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1434 cited Pine v Casello Constructions Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1854 cited Ponzio v D and E Air Conditioning Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 964 cited Furlong v Maxim Electrical Services (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2006] FCA 1705 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 11 cited Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2005) 224 ALR 467 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission & Distribution Ltd [2001] ATPR 41-815 cited Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 referred to Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 cited Australian Trade Commission v Disktravel [2000] FCA 62 referred to Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate