Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v GWP Development Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1070
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v GWP DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
QUD 202 of 2009
LOGAN J
18 SEPTEMBER 2009
BRISBANE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 202 of 2009
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff
AND: GWP DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
Defendant
JUDGE: LOGAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 SEPTEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. GWP Development Pty Ltd ACN 103 952 281 be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). 2. Nick Jim Combis, an official liquidator, be appointed liquidator of the company. 3. The Plaintiff's costs to be fixed in the sum of $1,137.31 and reimbursed in accordance with s 466(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 202 of 2009
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff
AND: GWP DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
Defendant
JUDGE: LOGAN J
DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2009
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) has made application under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the winding up of GWP Developments Pty Ltd. The basis for the application is a failure on the part of that company to comply with the terms of a statutory demand made by the Commissioner pursuant to statute in respect of revenue debts owed to the Commonwealth of Australia and payable to the Commissioner. The company has failed to comply with that statutory demand. 2 Application was made today for the adjournment of the winding up application. Reference was made by the solicitor for the company to contracts to which the company is a party for the sale of land. Those contracts have very properly been included in the material read on behalf of the Commissioner on today's application. They form the basis, it seems, of an endeavour informally on the part of the company to reach agreement with the Commissioner for the adjournment of the winding up application. As it transpired, the Commissioner was not disposed to agree to the course proposed by the company.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate