Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brown v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2009] FCA 1098
MIGRATION – cancellation of visa pursuant to s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – review of decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether the failure to put certain allegations to the applicant constitutes a denial of procedural fairness – whether the Tribunal had a duty to inquiry as to the existence of any sentencing remarks – whether, in the circumstances, a failure to make inquiries of a particular kind into sentencing remarks constituted jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal applied a standard of proof less than a standard of balance of probabilities – the decision below is not infected with any jurisdictional error. HELD: the application for review be dismissed. WORDS & PHRASES: 'duty to inquire'.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476AC(1)(b), 499(1), 499(2A), 501(2), 501(6)(a), 501(6)(c)(i), 501(6)(c)(ii), 501(7) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 33
Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2005) 225 CLR 88 considered Barbaro (Saverio) v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1982) 44 ALR 690 referred to Browne v Dunn [1893] 6 R 67 referred to Collins v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1981) 36 ALR 598 referred to Commissioner for ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576considered John v Rees [1970] Ch 345cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 cited Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24referred to Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v Le (2007) 164 FCR 151cited Minister for Immigration & Citizenship v SZIAI & Anor [2009] HCA 39 considered Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Baker (1997) 73 FCR 187applied Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 31 ALR 666 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Ball (2004) 138 FCR 450 referred to NAOA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCAFC 241cited Ngaronoa v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1565considered Ngaronoa v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship (2007) 244 ALR 119 referred to Pilbara Aboriginal Land Council v Minister for Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Affairs (2000) 103 FCR 539referred to Prasad v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155considered Puafisi v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 39 referred to R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeals Tribunal; Ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228 referred to Re Kirby and Collector of Customs (1989) 20 ALD 369cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 referred to Re Ruddock; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 referred to Seyfarth v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2005) 142 FCR 580 applied Tickner v Bropho (1993) 40 FCR 183cited Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 440 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate