Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dale v State of Western Australia [2009] FCA 1201 NATIVE TITLE – application under O 20 r 4 Federal Court Rules (FCR) for summary dismissal – issue estoppel – earlier determination by Court that native title claimants could not establish continuity of existence as a group since sovereignty – whether ultimate 'findings' made in earlier determination – whether same issue had been decided – whether the parties to the determination were the same PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – principles applicable to an application under O 20 r 4 FCR for summary dismissal Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13(1), 61, 61(1), 67(1), 85A, 223, 223(1) Federal Court Rules O 20 r 2, O 20 r 4 Australian Building Industries Pty Ltd v Stramit Corporation Limited & Anor [1997] FCA 1318 Blair v Currun (1939) 62 CLR 464 Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd [No.2] [1967] 1 AC 853 Commonwealth of Australia v Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 322 Dale v Moses [2007] FCAFC 82 Daniel v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 666 De Rose v South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 DP World Australia Ltd v Fremantle Port Authority [2009] WASCA 16 Egri v DRG Australia Ltd (1988) 19 NSWLR 600 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hoysted v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1921) 29 CLR 537 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363 Lancee v Willert [2008] WASCA 120 Lombardo v Stuart Bros Pty Ltd (1967) 68 SR(NSW) 159 Lonrho Plc v Fayed (No 2) [1992] 1 WLR 1 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 Moran v Minister for Land & Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [1999] FCA 1637 Moses v Western Australia (2007) 160 FCR 148 North Ganalanja Aboriginal Corporation v Queensland (1996) 185 CLR 595 Phillips v State of Western Australia [2000] FCA 1274 Quall v Northern Territory of Australia [2009] FCA 18 Risk (on behalf of Larrakia People) v Northern Territory and Others (No NTD 5 of 2006) (2007) 240 ALR 75 Risk v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 404 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 4) (2005) 214 ALR 686 Squires Transport Pty Ltd v Turnor [2004] WASCA 245 Supreme Court of the United States in Cromwell v County of Sac (1876) 94 US 351 Taylor v Ansett Transport Industries Ltd (1987) 18 FCR 342 Van Hemmen on behalf of The Kabi Kabi People #3 v State of Queensland [2007] FCA 1185 Walker on behalf of The Noonukul of Minjerrabah v State of Queensland [2007] FCA 967 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178 Wyatt v MR and RC Smith Pty Ltd [2008] WASCA 55
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate