Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Khant v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1247
MIGRATION – student visa – whether appellant had complied with conditions of visa – whether Tribunal should have made decision pursuant to s 359C of the Migration Act 1958 – whether information before Tribunal was sufficient to make decision – whether Tribunal should have sought further information – whether Tribunal failed to make an obvious inquiry about a critical fact, the existence of which is easily ascertained – whether failure to make that inquiry was a jurisdictional error PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE– whether leave should be granted to allow new grounds of appeal to be argued – whether grounds of appeal relating to conduct of Tribunal ought to be allowed where grounds were not argued before Federal Magistrate – whether prejudicial to respondent
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) The Constitution s 75(v) Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) s 20 Migration Act 1958 (Cth)ss 116, 137L(1)(b), 352(4), 353, 357A(3), 359(1), 359A(1), 359C, 360(3), 363A, 366, 379C(4), 424(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)reg 2.43(2)(b) Abebe v The Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited Chen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 142 FCR 257 referred to Luu and Another v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39 cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Le and Others (2007) 164 FCR 151 considered Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI and Another (2009) 259 ALR 429 followed Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZKTI and Another (2009) 258 ALR 434 followed Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMOK and Others (2009) 257 ALR 427 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eschetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 referred to NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and Indigenous Affairs (2005)147 FCR 51 considered Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 referred to Re Ruddock (in his capacity as Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) and Another; Ex parte APPLICANT S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 cited Snedden v Republic of Croatia (No 2) [2009] FCAFC 132 referred to SZJBA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship and Another (2007) 164 FCR 14 referred to SZKCQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 578 referred to VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168 referred to Videto and Another v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 8 FCR 167 cited Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491 explained OAK SOE KHANT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate