Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAOX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2009] FCA 1264
COSTS – power of Court to order costs – whether the Court has power to award costs in respect of proceedings in the Refugee Review Tribunal from which an application for Constitutional writs was made – s 43 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) vests in the Court only jurisdiction to award costs in proceedings before the Court – no power to award costs in respect of proceedings in the Refugee Review Tribunal Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)s 43 Federal Court Rules O 62 rr3, 5 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 276, 277, 281, 476(1) Dutton v Republic of South Africa(1999) 162 ALR 625 applied Dutton v Republic of South Africa (1999) 92 FCR 575 cited NAOX and SZFSG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 1795 of 2008
SPENDER J
6 NOVEMBER 2009
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1795 of 2008
GENERAL DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NAOX
First Appellant
SZFSG
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 NOVEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1. The Federal Court of Australia, on an appeal to it from a decision of the Federal Magistrates Court, has no power to award costs in respect of proceedings in the Refugee Review Tribunal, from which an application for constitutional writs was made to the Federal Magistrates Court. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate