Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZNMS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1265
MIGRATION – appeal from Federal Magistrate – no appellable error – appeal dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 424(2) Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZKTI (2009) 258 ALR 434 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZNAV [2009] FCAFC 109 SZGGD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1250 SZNAV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2009) 229 FLR 461 SZNMS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
NSD 956 OF 2009
BARKER J
5 NOVEMBER 2009
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
general division NSD 956 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZNMS
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BARKER J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 NOVEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
general division NSD 956 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZNMS
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BARKER J
DATE: 5 NOVEMBER 2009
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
appeal 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of a Federal Magistrate delivered on 24 August 2009. The Federal Magistrate dismissed the appellant's application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) dated 20 March 2009. The Tribunal had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent (Minister) to refuse the appellant a protection visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate