Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kronen v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 1268 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Social Security law – decision to cancel Newstart payment following repeated participation failures – appeal pursuant to s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether a question of law stated – proper construction of "to be negotiated" contrived by it's legislative setting – right to negotiate limited in the context of Social Security law – no error of law in Tribunal's construction – Secretary not satisfied that applicant had reasonable excuse for repeated participation failures – appeal dismissed Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 593(1)(c), (d) and (e), s 601(4), s 605(1), (2) and (3), s 606, s 615(1), (4) and (6), s 624(1)(a) and (c), s 624(2), s 629(1), s 630(1)(c) Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) s 64, s 80(1), ss 80-82, s 131 Social Security (Reasonable Excuse) (DEWR) Determination 2006
Comcare v Etheridge [2006] FCAFC 27 cited Vranic v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCA 672cited Waterford v The Commonwealth (1987) 163 CLR 54 cited Craig v South Australia(1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 applied HORST KRONEN v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
No SAD 60 of 2009
FINN J
9 NOVEMBER 2009
ADELAIDE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
general division SAD 60 of 2009
BETWEEN: HORST KRONEN
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
Respondent
JUDGE: FINN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate