Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parker, In the matter of Purcom No 34 Pty Limited (In Liq) (ACN 006 794 672) [2009] FCA 1359
CORPORATIONS – approval sought by receiver to enter into agreement – principles on which Court will grant approval
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 424, 477 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 57 Federal Court Rules O 26 r 7 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Ludgates Corporate and Advisory Services Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1368 applied Bell Group Ltd (in liq), Re [2009] WASC 235 cited Empire (Aust) Nominees Pty Ltd v Vince (2000) 18 ACLC 738 cited Martyniuk v King [2000] VSC 319 cited Mento Developments (Aust) Pty Ltd (ACN 005 862 457) (in liq), Re (2009) 73 ACSR 622 cited Mineral Securities Australia Ltd (in liq), Re [1973] 2 NSWLR 207 applied MTM Funds Management Ltd v Cavalane Holdings Pty Ltd (2000) 158 FLR 121 cited One.Tel Networks Holdings Pty Ltd (Hall as rec and mgr), Re (2001) 40 ACSR 83 applied Stewart, in the matter of Newtronics Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1375 applied University of Western Australia v Gray (No 6) [2006] FCA 1825 cited GREGORY JAY PARKER and PURCOM NO 34 PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 006 794 672) v ROBERT FREDERICK LEE TUCKER, RICHARD JAMES TUCKER, PURCOM NO 34 ADMIN PTY LIMITED (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED) (ACN 134 158 508), ANDREW ZISSIMOU, PRAHRAN TYRE CENTRE PTY LIMITED, GERARD CONLON and JUNE DANKS
VID 636 of 2009
GORDON J
19 NOVEMBER 2009
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 636 of 2009
GENERAL DIVISION
IN THE MATTER OF PURCOM NO 34 PTY LIMITED (IN LIQ) (ACN 006 794 672) BETWEEN: GREGORY JAY PARKER
First Plaintiff
PURCOM NO 34 PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 006 794 672)
Second Plaintiff
AND: ROBERT FREDERICK LEE TUCKER
First Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate