Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mills v State of Queensland [2009] FCA 1431
NATIVE TITLE – consideration of an application pursuant to s 66B(1)(a)(ii) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) to substitute for the deceased applicant representative of the Naghir People another representative of the Naghir People – consideration of the description of the meeting and participants at the meeting said to represent descendants of the ancestors of the Naghir People – consideration of the record-keeping in relation to the authorisation meeting - consideration of the submissions put to the Court by leave by the Torres Strait Regional Authority Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – ss 61, 66B, 87 and 87A ALFRED MILLS ON BEHALF OF THE NAGHIR PEOPLE #1 v STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS QUD 6084 of 1998
GREENWOOD J
2 DECEMBER 2009
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 6084 of 1998
BETWEEN: ALFRED MILLS ON BEHALF OF THE NAGHIR PEOPLE #1
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS
Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 DECEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application by notice of motion filed on 13 August 2009 is adjourned generally to enable a mediation process to be undertaken facilitated by the Torres Strait Regional Authority. 2. The parties have liberty to apply on 7 days' notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
general dIvision QUD 6084 of 1998
BETWEEN: ALFRED MILLS ON BEHALF OF THE NAGHIR PEOPLE #1
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate