Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network, G.P [2009] FCA 1445
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – TRADE MARKS – Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – test for leave to appeal under s 195(2) – whether there is sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration of the matter and whether denial of an opportunity to appeal would involve a substantial injustice supposing the decision of the primary judge to have been wrong EVIDENCE – whether there is sufficient doubt that the refusal of primary judge to allow an affidavit resulted in the denial of a fair trial on the issues of ownership and intention to use – test to be applied – whether the affidavit contained material evidence and whether it was erroneously rejected thereby depriving the possibility of a successful outcome INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – TRADE MARKS – s 44 – whether the primary judge made a proper assessment of deceptive similarity – test to be applied – two step process Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), ss 42, 43, 44, 44(1), 58, 59, 60, 195, 195(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 25(2)(a), 25(2) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 135 Federal Court Rules, O 52 r 2AA Television Food Network, G.P. v Food Channel Network Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 271 Woolworths Ltd v BP Plc (2006) 150 FCR 134; [2006] FCAFC 52 Kenman Kandy Australia Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Mark [2002] FCAFC 273 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Pfizer Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (2006) 155 FCR 578; [2006] FCAFC 190 The Scotch Whiskey Association v De Witt [2008] FCA 73 Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 Television Food Network, GP v Food Channel Network Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 378 Balenzuela v De Gail (1959) 101 CLR 226 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Malibu Boats West, Inc v Catanese (2000) 180 ALR 119 Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Rajski v Scitec Corporation Pty Ltd (Court of Appeal (NSW), unreported, 16 June 1986) Morton v Vouris (1996) 21 ACSR 497 Woodward v Loadman (No 1) (2007) 22 NTLR 1 Wills v Australian Broadcasting Commission [2009] FCAFC 6 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 In the Matter of An Application by the Pianotist Company Ltd for the Registration of a Trade Mark (1906) 23 RPC 774 Cooper Engineering Company Proprietary Limited v Sigmund Pumps Limited (1952) 86 CLR 536 Southern Cross Refrigerating Company v Toowoomba Foundry Proprietary Limited (1954) 91 CLR 592
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate