Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pipinias v Newport Quays Stage 2A Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1452
MANUAL PIPINIAS v NEWPORT QUAYS STAGE 2A PTY LTD ACN 117 374 222, MC MARINA SOUTH LTD ACN 121 362 301, MAXWELL BARBER, TRAVIS BARBER and LARISSA BARBER; URBAN CONSTRUCT PROJECT MARKETING PTY LTD ACN 095 779 669; URBAN CONSTRUCT PTY LTD
SAD 150 of 2008
LANDER J
3 DECEMBER 2009
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 150 of 2008
BETWEEN: MANUAL PIPINIAS
Applicant/Cross Respondent
AND: NEWPORT QUAYS STAGE 2A PTY LTD ACN 117 374 222
First Respondent/Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
MC MARINA SOUTH LTD ACN 121 362 301
Second Respondent/Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
MAXWELL BARBER
Third Respondent/Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
TRAVIS BARBER
Fourth Respondent/Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
LARISSA BARBER
Fifth Respondent/Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
URBAN CONSTRUCT PROJECT MARKETING PTY LTD ACN 095 779 669
Cross Claimant/Cross Respondent
URBAN CONSTRUCT PTY LTD
Cross Respondent
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 DECEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's claim against the first to fourth respondents (inclusive) be dismissed. 2. The applicant have leave to discontinue the proceeding against the fifth respondent. 3. The applicant pay the first and second respondents' costs of and incidental to the applicant's proceeding against the first and second respondents, to be taxed in default of agreement. 4. There be no order as to costs on the applicant's claim against the third and fourth respondents. 5. The first and second respondents' cross-claim against the applicant be adjourned for mention only to Wednesday, 10 March 2010 at 9.00am. 6. The cross-claim by the first and second respondents against the third and fourth respondents be dismissed with no order as to costs. 7. The cross-claim by the first and second respondents against Urban Construct Project Marketing Pty Ltd be dismissed with no order as to costs. 8. The cross-claim by the third and fourth respondents against the first and second respondents and Urban Construct Project Marketing Pty Ltd be dismissed with no order as to costs. 9. The cross-claim by Urban Construct Project Marketing Pty Ltd against the first to fourth respondents (inclusive) be dismissed with no order as to costs. 10. The cross-claim by the fifth respondent against Urban Construct Pty Ltd be dismissed with no order as to costs. 11. Paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 of the orders made on 16 October 2008 be discharged. 12. The applicant pay the fifth respondent's costs on a party and party basis up to 19 November 2009 and thereafter on an indemnity basis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate