Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Watson v AWB Limited (No 7) [2010] FCA 41 Citation: Watson v AWB Limited (No 7) [2010] FCA 41
Parties: JOHN WATSON AND KAYE WATSON IN THEIR OWN RIGHT AND AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GROUP MEMBERS v AWB LIMITED (ACN 081 890 459)
File number: NSD 2020 of 2007
Judges: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – correct approach to the masking of portions of documents produced in answer to a subpoena on the ground that the portions are irrelevant to any issue in the proceedings and on public interest immunity grounds PRIVILEGE – consideration of claims of public interest immunity in respect of parts of documents produced in answer to a subpoena
Cases cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 applied National Employers' Mutual General Association Limited v Waind and Hill (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 applied Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 applied Watson and Anor v AWB Limited (No 2) (2009) 259 ALR 524 cited
Date of hearing: 2 February 2010
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate