Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mantra Group Pty Ltd v Tailly Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 66 Citation: Mantra Group Pty Ltd v Tailly Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 66
Parties: MANTRA GROUP PTY LTD ACN 110 396 999, MANTRA IP PTY LTD ACN 129 980 981 and SUNLEISURE OPERATIONS PTY LTD ACN 113 285 153 v TAILLY PTY LTD ACN 105 940 181 and STEPHAN ANDREW GRANT
File number: QUD 224 of 2009
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 10 February 2010
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 76(1), 79
Cases cited: Harrington-Smith and Others on behalf of the Wongatha People v State of Western Australia and Others (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 424 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705
Date of hearing: 10 February 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr A Crowe SC
Solicitor for the Applicants: Malleson Stephen Jaques
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms K O'Gorman
Solicitor for the Respondents: Chan Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 224 of 2009
BETWEEN: MANTRA GROUP PTY LTD ACN 110 396 999
First Applicant
MANTRA IP PTY LTD ACN 129 980 981
Second Applicant
SUNLEISURE OPERATIONS PTY LTD ACN 113 285 153
Third Applicant
AND: TAILLY PTY LTD ACN 105 940 181
First Respondent
STEPHAN ANDREW GRANT
Second Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 FEBRUARY 2010
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Paragraph 6 of the affidavit of Dennis Leslie Porter affirmed 23 November 2009 not be admitted. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate