Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Conway v Mercedes-Benz Australia / Pacific Pty Ltd ACN 004 411 410 [2010] FCA 72 Citation: Conway v Mercedes-Benz Australia / Pacific Pty Ltd ACN 004 411 410 [2010] FCA 72
Parties: BROOKE CONWAY v MERCEDES-BENZ AUSTRALIA / PACIFIC PTY LTD ACN 004 411 410 and TYNAN MOTORS PTY LTD ACN 000 663 347
File number: NSD 1002 of 2009
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – request for particulars – purpose of particulars – distinction between request for particulars and request for evidence – overarching purpose of the Federal Court Rules
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 71 Federal Court Rules O 12 rr 4, 5
Cases cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Newcastle Formwork Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) NSWCA 144, referred to Bailey v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 136 CLR 214, cited Bruce v Odhams Press Ltd [1936] 1 KB 697, applied Mummery v Irvings Pty Ltd (1956) 96 CLR 99, applied Nowlan v Marson Transport Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 346, 53 NSWLR 116, cited Sides Engineering Pty Ltd v Energetech Australia Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1672, referred to Sims v Wran [1984] 1 NSWLR 317, applied Sydney South West Area Health Service v MD [2009] NSWCA 343, 260 ALR 702, cited White v Overland [2001] FCA 1333, applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate