Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ng v Van Der Velde [2010] FCA 89 Citation: Ng v Van Der Velde [2010] FCA 89
Parties: KYM HON TOKE NG v TERRY VAN DER VELDE AND DAVID STIMPSON and RIBY PTY LTD (ACN 081 153 219) IN LIQUIDATION AS TRUSTEE FOR THE JADE TRUST
File number: QUD 4 of 2010
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and Orders – Stay of execution – Consideration of whether the Appellant demonstrated an appropriate case – Special or exceptional circumstances not necessary – Whether the appeal will be rendered nugatory if stay not granted is a relevant factor PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Security for costs – Approach to impecuniosity of appellant fundamentally different on appeal – Consideration of what amounts to impecuniosity – Consideration of appellant's prospects of success of appeal – Only a preliminary assessment is needed – Does the appellant have an arguable case PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for leave to adduce new factual and legal issues on appeal – Adequate explanation for failure to raise these issues at first instance is needed – Consideration of whether the new issues have merit – Consideration of whether the respondent will suffer any prejudice if leave granted and whether that can be remedied
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 468, 588FE, 588FG Federal Court Rules, O 28 r 3, O 32 r 2(2), O 52 r 17, O 52 r 21, O 52 r 36 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 56 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate