Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Canberra Residential Developments Pty Limited v Brendas [2010] FCA 90 Citation: Canberra Residential Developments Pty Limited v Brendas [2010] FCA 90
Parties: CANBERRA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED v SPIROS BRENDAS, BEVERLEY ROSE BRENDAS, KENOSS PTY LIMITED and CANBERRA LAND DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD
File number: ACD 21 of 2006
Judge: STONE J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2010
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs order should be stayed - whether interim certificate of taxation issued in breach of O62 r 42(1) – whether further taxation should be stayed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O62 r 42; r 46
Date of hearing: 16 February 2010
Place: Sydney (HEARD IN PART VIA VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr I Neil SC with Mr G Blank
Solicitor for the Applicant: Goodman Law
Counsel for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Mr D J Mossop
Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Gillespie-Jones & Co
Solicitor for the Fourth Respondent: O'Connor Harris
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate