Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZMOQ v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 95 Citation: SZMOQ v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 95
Parties: SZMOQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 1340 of 2009
Judges: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2010
Date of hearing: 17 February 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Phillips Fox
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1340 of 2009
BETWEEN: SZMOQ
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 FEBRUARY 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be refused. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs as taxed or agreed.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1340 of 2009
BETWEEN: SZMOQ
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE: 19 FEBRUARY 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate