Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2010] FCA 104 Citation: Kowalski v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2010] FCA 104
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL and AMP SUPERANNUATION LTD ABN 31 008 414 04
File number: SAD 192 of 2009
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2010
Date of hearing: 15 January 2010
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: SD Voss
Solicitor for the Respondents: Thomson Playford Cutlers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 192 of 2009
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
AMP SUPERANNUATION LTD ABN 31 008 414 04
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 FEBRUARY 2010
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal from the order of Besanko J made on 9 December 2009 dismissing the notice of motion of the applicant of 4 November 2009 be refused.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 192 of 2009
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate