Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The Sunnyfield Association v Cronk [2010] FCA 143 Citation: The Sunnyfield Association v Cronk [2010] FCA 143
Parties: THE SUNNYFIELD ASSOCIATION v PAUL ANDREW CRONK
File number(s): NSD 135 of 2009
Judge: GRAHAM J
Date of judgment: 26 February 2010
Catchwords: PATENTS – application for leave to appeal under s 158(2) of the Patents Act 1990 from a judgment given on an appeal against decisions of a delegate of the Commissioner of Patents – applicable principles Held: application dismissed
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 40, 59, 60(4), 79B, 114,158(2) and 160 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Patents Regulations 1991 regs 3.12 – 3.14
Cases cited: Sunnyfield Association v Cronk (2009) 80 IPR 300 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1988) 13 IPR 385 Niemann v Electronic Industries Ltd [1978] VR 431 Re Luck (2003) 78 ALJR 177; 203 ALR 1 Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (1999) 92 FCR 106 Lockwood Security Products Pty Limited v Doric Products Pty Limited (2004) 217 CLR 274 Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône Poulenc v Commissioner of Patents (1958) 100 CLR 5 Rehm Pty Ltd v Websters Securities Systems (International) Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 79
Date of hearing: 8 May 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate