Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pre-Paid Professional Administration Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 173 Citation: Pre-Paid Professional Administration Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 173
Appeal from: Pre Paid Professional Administration Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1580
Parties: PRE-PAID PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATION LIMITED v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: VID 263 of 2009
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether special reasons existed to support application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal under Order 52 Rule 15(2) of the Federal Court Rules – case flimsy and weak on merits – not appropriate to raise on application to extend time new issues not heard at trial Held: application dismissed with costs
Legislation: Federal Court Rules
Cases cited: Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 applied Jackamarra v Krakouer (1998) 195 CLR 516 applied Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 applied Pre-Paid Professional Administration Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1580 referred to Secretary for the Home Department; Ex parte Mehta [1975] 1 WLR 1087 applied Whisprun Pty Limited v Dixon (2003) 200 ALR 447, [2003] HCA 48 applied
Date of hearing: 16 February 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 35
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate