Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2010] FCA 189
Citation: Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority [2010] FCA 189
Parties: MICHAEL ALEXANDER, NARASIM ANAND RAJU and PHILIP HARDY v THE AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY PHARMACY AUTHORITY, PHILIP COLASANTE, ADRIAN SEBASTIANO and ADAM SEBASTIANO
File number(s): VID 881 of 2009
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2010
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial Review – Whether failure to take into account relevant considerations – Obligation to provide reasons for decision – Failure of reasons to deal with constituent facts to an ultimate fact – Whether omission from statement of reasons justifies an inference that matter not taken into account.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(2B) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 3, 5 and 13 National Health Act 1953 (Cth), Part VII, ss 89, 90, 99J, 99K and 99N National Health (Australian Community Pharmacy Authority Rules) Determination 2006, Schedule 1, ss 6 and 9, Item 110, Item 201, Schedule 2, Items 301 and 302 and Schedule 3. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 430
Cases cited: Ansett Transport v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 Appellant V324 of 2004 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 259 ARM Constructions v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 197 ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 65 ALR 343 Carlisle Homes Pty Ltd v Barrett Property Group Pty Limited [2009] FCAFC 31 Civil Aviation Safety Authority v Central Aviation Pty Ltd (2009) 253 ALR 263 Collins v Repatriation Commission (1980) 32 ALR 581 Dennis Wilcox Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 79 ALR 267 Department of Health and Ageing and Another (2009) 178 FCR 161 Dodds v Comcare Australia (1993) 31 ALD 690 Dornan v Riordan (1990) 24 FCR 564 Faulkner v Conwell (1989) 21 FCR 41 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Cainero (1988) 15 ALD 368 Hunter v Transport Accident Commission (2005) 43 MVR 130 Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis (1979) 140 CLR 675 Mees v Kemp (2005) 141 FCR 385 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Taveli (1990) 23 FCR 162 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Oak Valley v ATSIC (1999) 98 FCR 1 Our Town FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1987) 16 FCR 465 Powell v Evreniades (1989) 21 FCR 252 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 Re MIMIA; ex Parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212 Repatriation Commission v O'Brien (1985) 155 CLR 422 Ross v Costigan (1982) 59 FLR 184 Steed v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 37 ALR 620 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 Terry White Chemists Australia Fair v Secretary, Traill v McRae [2002] FCAFC 235 Turner v Minister for Immigration (1981) 35 ALR 388
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate