Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Orica Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 197 Citation: Orica Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 197
Parties: ORICA LIMITED (ACN 004 145 868) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: VID 232 of 2005
Judge: SUNDBERG J
Date of judgment: 10 March 2010
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – capital gains – whether assessment excessive – parent company assessed – whether subsidiary should have been assessed instead – asset disposed of – rights under distribution agreement – whether parent or subsidiary owned asset on disposal – identification of disposal giving rise to capital gain – right to payment of amount to be ascertained by valuation process – whether debitum in praesenti solvendum in futuro – release of prospective but not accrued liabilities – whether novation – market value of asset on disposal – valuation evidence – penalties – whether taxpayer's position reasonably arguable when return lodged.
Legislation: Corporations Act 1974 (Cth) Part 2M.3 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 160Z(1)(a), 160ZD, 160ZH, 160ZO, 160M, 226K, 222C(a) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZO
Cases cited: Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 considered Federal Commissioner of Taxation v ANZ Savings Bank Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 467 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 cited Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85 cited O'Keefe v Williams (1910) 11 CLR 171 cited Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365 cited Re Ahearn; Ex parte Palmer (1906) 6 SR (NSW) 576 cited Walker v Corboy (1990) 19 NSWLR 382 applied Walsh Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 130 ALR 415 cited Walstern Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 138 FCR 1 followed Webb v Stenton (1883) 11 QBD 518 cited Weldwood‑Westply Ltd v Cundy (1965) 50 DLR (2d) 744 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate