Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network, GP [2010] FCA 204 Citation: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network, GP[2010] FCA 204
Parties: FOOD CHANNEL NETWORK PTY LTD ACN 079 015 339 v TELEVISION FOOD NETWORK, G.P
File number: QUD 103 of 2009
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 4 March 2010
Catchwords: No Catchwords
Legislation: Federal Court Rules, O 52 r 17
Cases cited: Ng v Van Der Velde [2010] FCA 89
Date of hearing: 4 March 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr LA Stephens
Solicitor for the Applicant: Potts and Co
Solicitor for the Respondent: Bennett & Philp
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 103 of 2009
BETWEEN: FOOD CHANNEL NETWORK PTY LTD ACN 079 015 339
Applicant
AND: TELEVISION FOOD NETWORK, G.P
Respondent
JUDGE: REEVES J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 MARCH 2010
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's application for an adjournment is refused. 2. The applicant's application for a stay be dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the stay application. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 103 of 2009
BETWEEN: FOOD CHANNEL NETWORK PTY LTD ACN 079 015 339
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate