Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones [2010] FCA 205 Citation: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones [2010] FCA 205
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION v DARRYL PETER JONES
File number: QUD 54 of 2010
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2010
Corrigendum: 15 March 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Interlocutory Injunction - Misleading or Deceptive Conduct - Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 - whether interim disclosure order can be authorised by Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 86C(2) - held s 86C(2) is not the source of such a power - held interim disclosure order can be authorised by s 80(2) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) the Federal Court's general powers under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) where the Federal Court has jurisdiction
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 80, 86C
Date of hearing: 5 March 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr MT Brady
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Respondent: The Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 54 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: DARRYL PETER JONES
Respondent
JUDGE: LOGAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 MARCH 2010
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate