Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 217 Citation: Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 217
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v MITSUBISHI MOTORS AUSTRALIA LTD
File numbers: SAD 112 of 2009 SAD 133 of 2009
Judge: SPENDER J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2010
Date of hearing: 16 February 2010
Place: Brisbane (Heard in Adelaide)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent Mr S Maharaj QC with Mr G Camilos in SAD 112 of 2009:
Solicitor for the Respondent Australian Government Solicitor in SAD 112 of 2009:
Counsel for the Respondent in SAD 133 of 2009 Ms V Heath
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 112 of 2009
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 FEBRUARY 2010
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. I order that the motion be dismissed. 2. I order the applicant on the motion to pay the costs of the respondent to the motion, such costs to be taxed if not agreed. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate