Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liongson v Olims Canberra Hotel [2010] FCA 248 Citation: Liongson v Olims Canberra Hotel [2010] FCA 248
Parties: CARL LIONGSON v OLIMS CANBERRA HOTEL
Appeal: Liongson v Olims Canberra Hotel [2009] FMCA 572
File number: ACD 30 of 2009
Judge: STONE J
Date of judgment: 15 March 2010
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O52 r38
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: S O'Brien
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION ACD 30 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CARL LIONGSON
Appellant
AND: OLIMS CANBERRA HOTEL
Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 MARCH 2010
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appellant's application to vacate the hearing of the appeal be dismissed. 2. The respondent's application in its notice of motion filed 15 March 2010 be allowed. 3. The appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of 15 March 2010. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION ACD 30 of 2009
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: CARL LIONGSON
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate