Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Doran v Investor Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 257 Citation: Doran v Investor Financial Planning Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 257
Parties: MAXINE JOY DORAN v INVESTOR FINANCIAL PLANNING PTY LTD (T/AS SUPERMASTER MANNING & PERRY FINANCIAL PLANNING) & ANOR
File number(s): VID 177 of 2009
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notice to produce – solicitors file – Whether legal professional privilege waived by implied consent
Cases cited: Benecke v National Australia Bank (1993) 35 NSWLR 110 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Seven Network Ltd v News Limited (No.10) (2005) 227 ALR 704
Date of hearing: 16 February 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Wilson
Solicitor for the Applicant: Tolhurst Druce & Emmerson
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr P Riordan SC with Mr S McGregor
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Wotton & Kearney
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION VID 177 of 2009
BETWEEN: MAXINE JOY DORAN
Applicant
AND: INVESTOR FINANCIAL PLANNING PTY LTD (T/AS SUPERMASTER MANNING & PERRY FINANCIAL PLANNING) & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate