Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
N. A. Retail Solutions Pty Limited v St George Bank Limited [2010] FCA 259 Citation: N. A. Retail Solutions Pty Limited v St George Bank Limited [2010] FCA 259
Parties: N. A. RETAIL SOLUTIONS PTY LIMITED (ACN 113 009 448) AND ORS v ST GEORGE BANK LIMITED AND ANOR
File number: NSD 271 of 2010
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 18 March 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory relief – contracts – an implied duty of good faith – unconscionable conduct – relief refused
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 45, 45D, 51AC
Cases cited: Asia Television Ltd v Yau's Entertainment Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 254, 48 IPR 283, cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 17, 253 ALR 324, cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682, cited Australian Airlines Commission v Commonwealth (1986) 17 FCR 445, 66 ALR 545, considered BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266, followed Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187, 69 NSWLR 558, cited Businessworld Computers Pty Ltd v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1988) 82 ALR 499, applied Byrne v Australian Airlines Limited (1995) 185 CLR 410, cited Carson v Minister for Education (Qld) (1989) 25 FCR 326, cited Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v Carlton & United Breweries Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 468, followed Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148, cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10, cited Far Horizons Pty Ltd v McDonalds Australia Ltd [2000] VSC 319, cited Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd [1986] 3 All ER 772, cited Garry Rogers Motors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 903, (1999) ATPR 41-703, cited GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 50, 128 FCR 1, cited McCarty v Council of the Municipality of North Sydney (1918) 18 SR(NSW) 210, cited R v Macfarlane; Ex parte O'Flanagan and O'Kelly (1923) 32 CLR 518, cited Racecourse Totalizators Pty Ltd v Totalisator Administration Board of Queensland (1995) 58 FCR 119, cited Telstra Corporation Ltd v First Netcom Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 860, 78 FCR 132, cited Vodafone Pacific Ltd v Mobile Innovations Ltd [2004] NSWCA 15, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate