Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 280 Citation: Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 280
Parties: RANJIT SHAMSHER JUNG BAHADUR RANA v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
File number: SAD 134 of 2009
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 26 March 2010
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – an appeal from the decision of a Member of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) – whether applicant was entitled to pension under Part IV of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – antecedent question of whether applicant was a veteran/member – Member correct to proceed by way of having the antecedent question determined first – the question was subsequently heard by a Deputy President of the AAT – no utility in this appeal – no reviewable decision made under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 69, 70
Cases cited: Director-General of Social Services v Chaney (1980) 47 FLR 80 cited Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 281 referred to
Date of hearing: 24 February 2010
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Schatz
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate