Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Young v Wyllie [2010] FCA 283 Citation: Young v Wyllie[2010] FCA 283
Parties: GARY YOUNG v GREG WYLLIE, VIDEO SPORTS PTY LTD, EX DVD PTY LTD, JIM ZAVOS, PITSTOP BOOKSHOP PTY LTD, BARBARA ELIZABETH LYSTER, ATLANTIC VIDEO, CHAOS ENTERTAINMENT PTY LTD, ROBERT APPEL, STOMP PTY LTD, ANDREW JORGENSEN, SANITY MUSIC STORES PTY LTD, (NO THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT NAMED), GREG MILNE and DARREN ROBINSON TRADING AS MOVIE SEARCH DOT COM
File number: ACD 41 of 2008
Judge: MOORE J
Date of judgment: 30 March 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - summary judgment pursuant to s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). COPYRIGHT – copyright in a cinematograph film – whether evidence of infringement of those rights. TRADE PRACTICES – whether evidence of misleading and deceptive conduct .
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10, 86, 101, 103 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53
Cases cited: Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v FKP Limited [2008] FCA 1915 discussed Dandaven v Harbeth Holdings Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 955 followed Houghton v Arms (2006) 225 CLR 553 distinguished Kervan Trading Pty Ltd v Aktas (1987) 8 IPR 583 applied Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Cooper (2005) 65 IPR 409 discussed Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd (2005) 220 ALR 1 cited Wang v Anying Group Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1500 followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate