Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alpine Beef Pty Ltd v Trycill Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCA 286 Citation: Alpine Beef Pty Ltd v Trycill Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2010] FCA 286
Parties: ALPINE BEEF PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CEETEX PTY LTD) (ACN 088 887 209) v TRYCILL PTY LTD (ACN 003 304 845) AND ORS
File number: NSD 232 of 2009
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 25 March 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – costs sought on an indemnity basis – limitation period – difficulties raised in correspondence – offer of compromise
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43, 59(1), 59(2) Federal Court Rules, O 23 rr 2–4
Cases cited: Alpine Beef Pty Ltd v Trycill Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 136, cited Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225, cited DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v InterTAN Inc [2004] FCA 1251, cited Gladstone Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Ross Wills (1984) 6 FCR 496, cited Olivaylle Pty Ltd v Flottweg GMBH and Co KGAA (No 5) [2009] FCA 571, cited Ruaro v Ferrari [2008] FCA 307, cited Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229, cited Sony Computer Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd v Dannoun (No 2) [2001] FCA 1530, cited Szencorp Pty Ltd v Clean Energy Council Ltd (No 2) [2009] FCA 196, cited Tetijo Holdings Pty Ltd v Keeprite Australia Pty Ltd (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, 3 May 1991), cited Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3) (1979) 42 FLR 213, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate