Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Huang v University of New South Wales (No 2) [2010] FCA 299 Citation: Huang v University of New South Wales (No 2) [2010] FCA 299
Parties: HONG CUI HUANG v UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES and FUCHUN XIAO
File number(s): NSD 125 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 12 March 2010
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – whether leave should be granted pursuant to s 9A of the Foreign Evidence Act 1994 (Cth)
Legislation: Foreign Evidence Act 1994 (Cth) s 9A
Date of hearing: 12 March 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
The Applicant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondents: I Latham
Solicitor for the Respondents: University Solicitor & General Counsel Legal Office, University of New South Wales
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 125 of 2010
BETWEEN: HONG CUI HUANG
Applicant
AND: UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES
First Respondent
FUCHUN XIAO
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 MARCH 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. There be no order as to the costs of the application.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 125 of 2010
BETWEEN: HONG CUI HUANG
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate