Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ugur v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police [2010] FCA 303 Citation: Ugur v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police [2010] FCA 303
Appeal from: Haci Ugur v Australian Federal Police [2009] AATA 405
Parties: HACI UGUR v COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
File number: NSD 670 of 2009
Judge: MOORE J
Date of judgment: 20 May 2010
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – AAT affirmed the Australian Federal Police's determination that it had provided the applicant with all documents relevant to his request under Freedom of Information law – whether AAT afforded procedural fairness or otherwise erred in its decision – interaction of ADJR Act and AAT Act – whether Court should exercise discretion under s 10(2)(b) of ADJR Act to dismiss application. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION – request for documents – relevant documents provided – 'reasonable' steps taken to locate relevant documents – documents exempt because 'irrelevant'.
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 10(2)(b) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) ss 22, 24A, 55
Cases cited: Combe v Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2005] FCA 1101 cited Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 cited Duncan v Fayle (2004) 138 FCR 510 applied Duncan v Hotop [2004] FCA 274 cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 cited Pancontinental Mining Ltd v Burns (1994) 124 ALR 471 applied Re Pergamon Press Ltd [1970] 3 All ER 535 cited Tuite v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (1993) 40 FCR 483 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate