Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HNA Irish Nominee Limited v Kinghorn [2010] FCA 311
Citation: HNA Irish Nominee Limited v Kinghorn [2010] FCA 311
Parties: HNA IRISH NOMINEE LIMITED and ANOR v GEOFFREY ANDREW KINGHORN and ORS
File number: NSD 94 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2010
Date of hearing: 22 and 23 March 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: M Leeming SC with J Hewitt
Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Chang, Pistilli & Simmons
Counsel for the Defendants: SD Robb QC with J Clarke
Solicitor for the Defendants: DibbsBarker
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 94 of 2010
BETWEEN: HNA IRISH NOMINEE LIMITED
First Plaintiff
ALLCO MANAGED INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Second Plaintiff
AND: GEOFFREY ANDREW KINGHORN
First Defendant
DAVID LLOYD VEAL
Second Defendant
KV AVIATION HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
Third Defendant
RIL AVIATION VQZ PTY LIMITED
ACN 110 563 007
Fourth Defendant
RIL AVIATION VQW PTY LIMITED
ACN 110 562 831
Fifth Defendant
RIL AVIATION MSN 163 PTY LIMITED
ACN 111 127 087
Sixth Defendant
RIL AVIATION MSN 185 PTY LIMITED
ACN 111 127 130
Seventh Defendant
RIL AVIATION VQU PTY LIMITED
ACN 114 265 833
EIGHTH DEFENDANT
RIL AVIATION VQT PTY LIMITED
ACN 114 265 842
Ninth Defendant
RIL AVIATION VQS PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate