Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reynolds v Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 322 Citation: Reynolds v Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 322
Appeal from: Aluma-Lite Products Pty Ltd v Reynolds & Anor [2010] FMCA 122
Parties: ROSS MACKENZIE MAX REYNOLDS and MARGOT LOGAN REYNOLDS v ALUMA-LITE PRODUCTS PTY LTD ACN 009 843 832
File number(s): QUD 65 of 2010
Judges: SPENDER J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2010
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – power of the Court to grant a stay of sequestration order until determination of appeal – relevant considerations – whether there is an arguable appeal point
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52(3) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 29 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 17
Cases cited: Boumelhem v Commonwealth Bank of Australia(2008) 171 FCR 462 cited Burns v AMP Finance Ltd [2005] FCA 761 referred to Evans v Heather Thiedeke Group Pty Ltd (1990) 95 ALR 424 referred to Freeman v National Australia Bank Limited [2002] FCA 427 cited Goldberg v Motto (2004) ALD 244 cited Rigg v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2001] FCA 1340 referred to
Date of hearing: 16 March 2010
Place: BRISBANE
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 82
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr L Harrison QC with Mr A Evans
Solicitor for the Appellants: Shand Taylor Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B O'Donnell QC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate