Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Plastec Australia Pty Ltd ACN 093 513 467 v Plumbing Solutions and Services Pty Ltd ACN 128 873 629 [2010] FCA 327 Citation: Plastec Australia Pty Ltd ACN 093 513 467 v Plumbing Solutions and Services Pty Ltd ACN 128 873 629 [2010] FCA 327
Parties: PLASTEC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 093 513 467 v PLUMBING SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 128 873 629, TONY GREGORY PURDON and RALPH T MARTIN
File number(s): QUD 272 of 2009
Judges: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 7 April 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application to strike out parts of an amended statement of claim as disclosing no reasonable cause of action – consideration of Order 11, rule 16(a) of the Federal Court Rules – consideration of whether an email communication contains a representation of fact – consideration of whether the collection of words contained within the email amounts to an opinion – consideration of the test for striking out the pleading of a cause of action reliant upon the email – consideration of the ultimate question to be determined in the principal proceeding
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52(1) Federal Court Rules, Order 11, rule 16(a)
Cases cited: General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 - applied Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 - applied Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 - applied Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 - applied Murex Diagnostics v Chiron Corp (1995) 55 FCR 194 - cited Re Elders Australia Ltd (No 2) [1997] FCA 1501 - cited Re Mark Turner v Kinian Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 396 - cited Kowalski v NMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 117; 178 FCR 401 - cited Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 - applied Butcher v Lachlan Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 - cited Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 - applied Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 - applied Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster [2009] FCA 682 - cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Dreamtime Creations Pty Ltd (2010) 263 ALR 487 - cited Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (1992) 38 FCR 1 – applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate