Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Holyoake Industries (Vic) Pty Ltd v V-Flow Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 377 Citation: Holyoake Industries (Vic) Pty Ltd v V-Flow Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 377
Parties: HOLYOAKE INDUSTRIES (VIC) PTY LTD and HOLYOAKE INDUSTRIES LTD v V-FLOW PTY LTD, JAMIE ROBERT BROWN, BOZIDAR MATKOVIC and ANTHONY ALOE
File number(s): VID 812 of 2009
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 29 March 2010
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS LAW Access to commercially sensitive information – Where trade rivals have inspected information – Considerations to be taken into account in assessing whether information should be disclosed – Court to assess documents
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cadbury Proprietary Limited v Amcor Ltd (No. 2) [2009] FCA 663, applied Home Office v Harman [1983] 1 AC 280, referred to Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Guina Developments Pty Ltd [1996] 2 VR 34, applied
Date of hearing: 29 March 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the First and Second Applicants: Mr P Cawthorn SC and Mr A Kirby
Solicitor for the First and Second Applicants: Nicholas O'Donoghue & Co
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr M Bevan-John
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Russell Kennedy Pty Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate