Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Soust (No 2) [2010] FCA 388 Citation: Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Soust (No 2) [2010] FCA 388
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v MARTIN SOUST
File number: VID 1087 of 2008
Judge: GOLDBERG J
Date of judgment: 23 April 2010
Corrigendum: 27 April 2010
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – penalty hearing – breach of directors' duties – market manipulation – disqualification from managing corporations – pecuniary penalty – Court's discretion – no evidence of remorse – relevant principles or factors to be applied.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): ss 181(1), 182(1), 206C(1), 1041A, 1041B(1), 1317DA, 1317E, 1317G Evidence Act 1995 (Cth): s 128(7)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 292, followed Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Forem‑Freeway Enterprises Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 339, applied Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129, followed Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MacDonald (No 12) (2009) 259 ALR 116, considered Re HIH Insurance Ltd (in prov liq) and HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd (in prov liq); Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (2002) 42 ACSR 80, applied Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vines (2006) 58 ACSR 298, followed ASC v Donovan (1998) 28 ACSR 583, followed Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABB Transmission and Distribution Ltd (No 2) (2002) 190 ALR 169, considered Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Beekink (2007) 238 ALR 595, followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate