Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tyco (Australia) Pty Ltd T/AS ADT Security v Signature Security Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 395 Citation: Tyco (Australia) Pty Ltd T/AS ADT Security v Signature Security Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 395
Parties: TYCO (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD TRADING AS ADT SECURITY v SIGNATURE SECURITY GROUP PTY LTD, SIMECORP PTY LTD, MARTIN SALAZAR, AUSTRALIAN SECURITY AND FIRE PTY LTD, GREGORY THOMAS, SECURITY SELECT PTY LTD and MICHAEL CALIFANO
File number(s): NSD 779 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 9 April 2010
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 cited Tyco Australia Pty Ltd T/AS ADT Security v Signature Security Group Pty Ltd (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, District Registrar Wall, 24 February 2010) cited
Date of hearing: 9 April 2010
Date of last submissions: 9 April 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms K Rees
Solicitor for the Applicant: DLA Phillips Fox
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr E A J Hyde
Solicitor for the Respondents: Norton Rose
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 779 of 2009
BETWEEN: TYCO (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD TRADING AS ADT SECURITY
Applicant
AND: SIGNATURE SECURITY GROUP PTY LTD
First Respondent
SIMECORP PTY LTD
Second Respondent
MARTIN SALAZAR
Third Respondent
AUSTRALIAN SECURITY AND FIRE PTY LTD
Fourth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate