Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Campaign Master (UK) Limited v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 4)[2010] FCA 398 Citation: Campaign Master (UK) Limited v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 398
Parties: CAMPAIGN MASTER (UK) LIMITED v FORTY TWO INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD and BLUEFREEWAY LIMITED
File number: NSD 651 of 2008
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 30 APRIL 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by non-parties to set aside a subpoena pursuant to O 27 r 4 FCR as an abuse of process – standing to seek relief – whether documents sought have an apparent relevance to the issues in the proceeding – whether subpoena issued for an improper or collateral purpose – relevant principles discussed HELD: Relief refused PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by non-parties pursuant to O 35 r 7(2) FCR to set aside order granting leave to use in another proceeding documents produced on subpoena in this proceeding – standing to seek relief – whether order should be set aside in all the circumstances – "special circumstances" – relevant principles discussed HELD: Relief refused
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 75 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37M Federal Court Rules, O 1 r 4A(b), O 11 r 16, O 20 r 5, O 27 r 4, O 35 r 7(2)
Cases cited: Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 404 Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No 18) (1995) 133 ALR 667 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Black on White Pty Ltd (2004) 138 FCR 314 Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd (2001) 105 FCR 136 Bond Corporation Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (1987) 14 FCR 193 BP Australia Ltd v Brown (2003) 58 NSWLR 322 Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2002) 118 FCR 1 Bray v F Hoffman-La Roche Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 317 Capital Webworks Pty Ltd v Adultshop.Com.Ltd (2002) 116 FCR 255 Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 Compsyd Pty Ltd v Streamline Travel Service Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 648 Corrs Pavey Whiting & Byrne v Collector of Customs (Vic) (1987) 14 FCR 434 Cosco Holdings Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 37 ATR 432 Crest Homes Plc v Marks [1987] 1 AC 829 Dahozo Pty Ltd v Oz-US Film Productions (1997) 24 ACSR 739 Dowling v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1915) 20 CLR 509 Dorajay Pty Limited v Aristocrat Leisure Limited [2005] FCA 588 Flower & Hart (a firm) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) 87 FCR 134 Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2010] FCA 397 Fried v National Australia Bank Ltd (2000) 175 ALR 194 Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 Hardie Rubber Co Pty Ltd v General Tire & Rubber Co (1973) 129 CLR 521 Holpitt Pty Ltd v Varimu Pty Ltd (1991) 29 FCR 576 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-679; [1999] FCA 56 King v Henderson [1898] AC 720 Liberty Funding Pty Ltd v Phoenix Capital Ltd (2005) 218 ALR 283 Mandic v Phillis (2005) 225 ALR 760 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 619 McIlwain v Ramsey Food Packaging Pty Ltd (2005) 221 ALR 785 Nicholson v Nicholson [1974] 2 NSWLR 59 Packer v Meagher [1984] 3 NSWLR 486 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (a firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 Re Excel Finance Corp Ltd; Worthley v England (1994) 52 FCR 69 Re Federal Commissioner of Taxation, Ex parte Swiss Aluminium Australia Ltd (1986) 68 ALR 587 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 5) (2005) 216 ALR 147 Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Ltd v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 22 FCR 73 Spencer Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Sweetman v Australian Thoroughbred Finance Pty Ltd (Unreported, Lockhart J, 23 July 1992) Tamawood Limited v Habitare Developments Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 364 TJM Products Pty Ltd v A & P Tyres Pty Ltd (1987) 17 FCR 390 Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1 KB 461 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (1989) 88 ALR 90 Uthmann v Ipswich City Council [1998] 1 Qd R 435 Wati v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 543 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate