Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Cole [2010] FCA 410 Citation: Kowalski v Cole [2010] FCA 410
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v RUSSELL JOHN COLE, WILLIAM ANDREW SIM and RJ COLE AND PARTNERS PTY LTD
File number: SAD 1 of 2010
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 30 April 2010
Date of hearing: 19 February 2010
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 60
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: RJ Cole
Solicitor for the Respondents: R.J. Cole and Partners
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 1 of 2010
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: RUSSELL JOHN COLE
First Respondent
WILLIAM ANDREW SIM
Second Respondent
RJ COLE AND PARTNERS PTY LTD
Third Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 APRIL 2010
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal from the decision of the Federal Magistrates Court given on 14 December 2009 in Kowalski v Cole [2009] FMC 1222 be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 1 of 2010
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: RUSSELL JOHN COLE
First Respondent
WILLIAM ANDREW SIM
Second Respondent
RJ COLE AND PARTNERS PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate