Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
S & V Nominees Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Rabobank Australia Limited (Formerly known as Primary Industry Bank of Australia Limited) [2010] FCA 429 Citation: S & V Nominees Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Rabobank Australia Limited (formerly known as Primary Industry Bank of Australia Limited) [2010] FCA 429
Parties: S & V NOMINEES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 060 323 033 and VIRGINIA PACKING SHED PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 062 072 557 v RABOBANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS PRIMARY INDUSTRY BANK OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED) ACN 001 621 129
File number: SAD 169 of 2009
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2010
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application to discharge examination summons – where one of two liquidators sought examination of company secretary of defendant and production of documents – where correspondence between liquidator's solicitors and defendant's solicitors suggested that liquidator's purpose was only to obtain documents – whether application amounted to an abuse of process because production of documents was not sought in aid of examination – whether categories of documents sought under summons were too wide and oppressive – whether application for examination summons had sufficient connection with proceeding to be brought in proceeding – whether one of two liquidators had standing Held: application dismissed – liquidator did not have sole purpose of obtaining documents – summons amended to limit documents to be produced – examination and production assisted liquidator's understanding of merits of proceeding – one of two liquidators appointed jointly and severally has standing to make application
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate