Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mead v Mead (No 2) [2010] FCA 432 Citation: Mead v Mead (No 2) [2010] FCA 432
Appeals from: Mead v Mead (No 2) [2009] FMCA 1107 Mead v Yang [2009] FMCA 1160
Parties: LUCY GUITAR MEAD v COLIN ANTHONY MEAD LEE CHIN LIEN YANG v COLIN ANTHONY MEAD
File number(s): NSD 1445 of 2009 NSD 1447 of 2009
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 6 May 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – failure to comply with Court order to pay security for costs – want of prosecution – appeals are a re-ventilation of matters already argued – appeals dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 25(2B)(ba), 25(2B)(bb)(i)
Cases cited: Mead v Mead [2010] FCA 288 cited Lee Chin Lien Yang v Colin Anthony Mead [2010] HCASL 51 referred to Lucy Guitar Mead v Colin Anthony Mead [2010] HCASL 52 referred to Yang v Mead [2009] FCA 1202 cited
Date of hearing: 6 May 2010
Date of last submissions: 6 May 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
In NSD 1445 of 2009:
The Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr Lim of Etheringtons Solicitors
In NSD 1447 of 2009:
The Appellant: Ms L Mead made submissions on behalf of the Appellant
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr Lim of Etheringtons Solicitors
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1445 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate